[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4632462E.7090109@clusterfs.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:51:26 +0400
From: Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
To: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Large File Deletion Comparison (ext3, ext4, XFS)
Valerie Clement wrote:
> As asked by Alex, I included in the test results the file fragmentation
> level and the number of I/Os done during the file deletion.
>
> Here are the results obtained with a not very fragmented 100-GB file:
>
> | ext3 ext4 + extents xfs
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> nb of fragments | 796 798 15
> elapsed time | 2m0.306s 0m11.127s 0m0.553s
> |
> blks read | 206600 6416 352
> blks written | 13592 13064 104
> ------------------------------------------------------------
hmm. if I did math right, then, in theory, 100GB file could be
placed using ~850 extents: 100 * 1024 / 120, where 120 is amount
of data one can allocate in regular group. 850 extents would
require 3 leaf blocks (340 extents/block) + 1 index block. we'd
need to read these 4 blocks + all 850 involved bitmaps + some
blocks of group descriptors. so, probably we need to tune balloc.
then we'd improve remove time by factor six (6400 blocks to read
vs. ~900-1000 blocks to read) ?
thanks, Alex
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists