linux-ext4 - Re: which kernel version should I submit patch ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 May 2007 13:05:37 +0800
From:	coly <colyli@...il.com>
To:	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: which kernel version should I submit patch ?

Badari:

Thanks, maybe Ted's tree is a good choice :-)

Best regards.

Coly

在 2007-05-02三的 16:16 -0700，Badari Pulavarty写道：
> On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 02:13 +0800, coly wrote:
> > Hi, list.
> > 
> > I find these days 2.6.21 released. If I will submit patches for ext4dev,
> > should I generate the patch against 2.6.21 ?
> 
> 
> If you find a bug in ext4 on 2.6.21 - yes, generate against 2.6.21.
> 
> Make sure its not already fixed in -mm or Ted's ext4 tree.
> 
> http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/
> 
> Thanks,
> Badari
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html