linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC] store RAID stride in superblock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <464524A4.9060209@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 May 2007 21:21:24 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
CC:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] store RAID stride in superblock

Andreas Dilger wrote:
> It is possible to specify the RAID stride to mke2fs allow it to optimize
> the layout of the bitmaps.  With the new mballoc it is also possible to
> tell it via a mount option to do large allocations aligned on the RAID
> stride (by default it aligns on 1MB boundaries from the start of the LUN).
> 
> What would be rather convenient is to store the RAID stride value in the
> superblock.  That would spare a lot of hassle on the part of the admin
> to tune the filesystem optimally for the underlying storage.  There is
> also a library used in the XFS tools that knows how to probe various
> kinds of block devices (e.g. MD RAID, LVM/DM, etc) to get their storage
> layout that would avoid the need for the user to specify anything.
> 
> Any thoughts on this?

I think it sounds great.  I think ext4 would benefit greatly from 
knowing a bit more about the underlying device geometry & allocating 
accordingly...

-Eric

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html