[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1179255549.4819.7.camel@dyn9047017103.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:59:08 -0700
From: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>,
Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
Cc: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>,
ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix section conflict of ext4_ext_{find_goal,invalidate_cache}
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 11:09 -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 19:15 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Building with GCC 4.2, I get the following error:
> >
> > CC [M] fs/ext4/extents.o
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2166: error: __ksymtab_ext4_ext_find_goal causes a section type conflict
> > fs/ext4/extents.c:2163: error: __ksymtab_ext4_ext_invalidate_cache causes a section type conflict
> >
> > This is because ext4_ext_find_goal and ext4_ext_invalidate_cache are
> > declared static but also exported.
>
> Hmm.. Why are these exported ?
> Looking at the code
>
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ext4_ext_invalidate_cache);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ext4_ext_insert_extent);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ext4_ext_walk_space);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ext4_ext_find_goal);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ext4_ext_calc_credits_for_insert);
>
there is one more
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ext4_mark_inode_dirty);
And with fallocate() patch,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ext4_fallocate);
> Mingming ? Why are we exporting these ?
>
Don't know. They should all used by ext4 only. Alex, can we remove these
exported symbols?
Mingming
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists