linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC][PATCH] Multiple mount protection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 May 2007 13:36:16 +0530
From:	Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...sterfs.com>
To:	Manoj Joseph <manoj@...sterfs.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Multiple mount protection

On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 13:23 +0530, Manoj Joseph wrote:
> Kalpak Shah wrote:
> 
> >> Also, I am curious about this. Is there a test case for mounting the 
> >> same filesystem multiple times? Does this use different paths to reach 
> >> the device? Or is there a race? Or does it happen on a device shared by 
> >> multiple hosts?
> >>
> > 
> > If you are using some HA software, there is the possibility of a race.
> > Yes it can happen on a device shared by multiple hosts.
> 
> Ah, if the HA-software doesn't deal with multiple mounts for filesystems 
> it is managing, then I would claim that the software is flawed. :)

Well, it is known to happen so it wouldn't be bad to make sure.

> 
> But yes, turning on MMP would help.
> 
> It might also help to make the frequency at which sequence number gets 
> updated (currently 5 sec) tunable. Would making that also a field in the 
> super block be a bad idea (set only by mkfs/tunefs)?

Updating the MMP sequence too often would hurt the filesystem
performance.

> 
> It might also be worthwhile to write the dev_t, the path of the device 
> and the hostname to the s_mmp_block, along with the random sequence. (I 
> assume there is enough space.) If the mount is being failed because of a 
> multiple mount  scenario, these fields could be used to provide useful 
> diagnostics.

Yes, the dev_t, host name, the sequence and the time last updated would
all be printed. There is lots of space since we have an entire block.

> My $ 0.02. :)

Thanks. :)

> 
> Regards,
> Manoj

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html