linux-ext4 - which tree should I generate the ext4 patch ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1179910843.4119.33.camel@coly-t43.site>
Date:	Wed, 23 May 2007 17:00:43 +0800
From:	coly <colyli@...il.com>
To:	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: which tree should I generate the ext4 patch ?

Hi, list

These days, I am tring to post my patch for inode reservation on
linux-ext4. But I am confused on which tree I should generate the patch.

I worked on mm-tree. But now Thoedore creates a tree for ext4, so should
I generate the patch based on tso-tree ?

Same question to e2fsprogs. I guess maybe I should generate the patch
for e2fsprogs based on e2fsprogs-TEST branch, a.k.a 1.40-WIP-0407. Isn't
it ?

This information has to be confirmed for me to generate the patch.
Thanks for anyone replys me :-)

Best regards.

Coly

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html