lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:00:43 +0800 From: coly <colyli@...il.com> To: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Subject: which tree should I generate the ext4 patch ? Hi, list These days, I am tring to post my patch for inode reservation on linux-ext4. But I am confused on which tree I should generate the patch. I worked on mm-tree. But now Thoedore creates a tree for ext4, so should I generate the patch based on tso-tree ? Same question to e2fsprogs. I guess maybe I should generate the patch for e2fsprogs based on e2fsprogs-TEST branch, a.k.a 1.40-WIP-0407. Isn't it ? This information has to be confirmed for me to generate the patch. Thanks for anyone replys me :-) Best regards. Coly - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists