[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070614214154.GR5181@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:41:54 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...sterfs.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean noel Cordenner <jean-noel.cordenner@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Separated 64-bit i_version patch
On Jun 14, 2007 13:58 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 21:26 +0530, Kalpak Shah wrote:
> > This patch converts the 32-bit i_version in the generic inode to a 64-
> > bit i_version field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean Noel Cordenner <jean-noel.cordenner@...l.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...sterfs.com>
> >
> > @@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ struct inode {
> > uid_t i_uid;
> > gid_t i_gid;
> > dev_t i_rdev;
> > - unsigned long i_version;
> > + uint64_t i_version;
> > loff_t i_size;
> > #ifdef __NEED_I_SIZE_ORDERED
> > seqcount_t i_size_seqcount;
> >
> >
>
>
> I think u64 is better here. It seems uint64_t is not defined in some
> cases and rarely being used.
Agreed.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists