[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <f0da9dbdd0751be62a0e.1182445211@candygram.thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:00:11 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: kalpak@...sterfs.com
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4 of 4] e2fsck: Check the all of journal blocks for validity
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
e2fsck/journal.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
# HG changeset patch
# User tytso@....edu
# Date 1182441546 14400
# Node ID f0da9dbdd0751be62a0e3b3afeec85ab27a13d20
# Parent 7a1859d26e58056688629ee2faf2f2ee619a1bf1
e2fsck: Check the all of journal blocks for validity
The original code only checked the direct blocks to make sure the
journal inode was sane. Unfortunately, if some or all of the indirect
or doubly indirect blocks were corrupted, this would not be caught.
Thanks to Andreas Dilger and Kalpak Shah for noticing this problem.
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
diff -r 7a1859d26e58 -r f0da9dbdd075 e2fsck/journal.c
--- a/e2fsck/journal.c Thu Jun 21 11:59:06 2007 -0400
+++ b/e2fsck/journal.c Thu Jun 21 11:59:06 2007 -0400
@@ -189,8 +189,37 @@ static void e2fsck_clear_recover(e2fsck_
ext2fs_mark_super_dirty(ctx->fs);
}
+/*
+ * This is a helper function to check the validity of the journal.
+ */
+struct process_block_struct {
+ e2_blkcnt_t last_block;
+};
+
+static int process_journal_block(ext2_filsys fs,
+ blk_t *block_nr,
+ e2_blkcnt_t blockcnt,
+ blk_t ref_block EXT2FS_ATTR((unused)),
+ int ref_offset EXT2FS_ATTR((unused)),
+ void *priv_data)
+{
+ struct process_block_struct *p;
+ blk_t blk = *block_nr;
+
+ p = (struct process_block_struct *) priv_data;
+
+ if (blk < fs->super->s_first_data_block ||
+ blk >= fs->super->s_blocks_count)
+ return BLOCK_ABORT;
+
+ if (blockcnt >= 0)
+ p->last_block = blockcnt;
+ return 0;
+}
+
static errcode_t e2fsck_get_journal(e2fsck_t ctx, journal_t **ret_journal)
{
+ struct process_block_struct pb;
struct ext2_super_block *sb = ctx->fs->super;
struct ext2_super_block jsuper;
struct problem_context pctx;
@@ -202,10 +231,8 @@ static errcode_t e2fsck_get_journal(e2fs
errcode_t retval = 0;
io_manager io_ptr = 0;
unsigned long start = 0;
- blk_t blk;
int ext_journal = 0;
int tried_backup_jnl = 0;
- int i;
clear_problem_context(&pctx);
@@ -258,6 +285,9 @@ static errcode_t e2fsck_get_journal(e2fs
j_inode->i_ext2.i_size = sb->s_jnl_blocks[16];
j_inode->i_ext2.i_links_count = 1;
j_inode->i_ext2.i_mode = LINUX_S_IFREG | 0600;
+ e2fsck_use_inode_shortcuts(ctx, 1);
+ ctx->stashed_ino = j_inode->i_ino;
+ ctx->stashed_inode = &j_inode->i_ext2;
tried_backup_jnl++;
}
if (!j_inode->i_ext2.i_links_count ||
@@ -270,20 +300,14 @@ static errcode_t e2fsck_get_journal(e2fs
retval = EXT2_ET_JOURNAL_TOO_SMALL;
goto try_backup_journal;
}
- for (i=0; i < EXT2_N_BLOCKS; i++) {
- blk = j_inode->i_ext2.i_block[i];
- if (!blk) {
- if (i < EXT2_NDIR_BLOCKS) {
- retval = EXT2_ET_JOURNAL_TOO_SMALL;
- goto try_backup_journal;
- }
- continue;
- }
- if (blk < sb->s_first_data_block ||
- blk >= sb->s_blocks_count) {
- retval = EXT2_ET_BAD_BLOCK_NUM;
- goto try_backup_journal;
- }
+ pb.last_block = -1;
+ retval = ext2fs_block_iterate2(ctx->fs, j_inode->i_ino,
+ BLOCK_FLAG_HOLE, 0,
+ process_journal_block, &pb);
+ if ((pb.last_block+1) * ctx->fs->blocksize <
+ j_inode->i_ext2.i_size) {
+ retval = EXT2_ET_JOURNAL_TOO_SMALL;
+ goto try_backup_journal;
}
if (tried_backup_jnl && !(ctx->options & E2F_OPT_READONLY)) {
retval = ext2fs_write_inode(ctx->fs, sb->s_journal_inum,
@@ -397,9 +421,11 @@ static errcode_t e2fsck_get_journal(e2fs
#endif
*ret_journal = journal;
+ e2fsck_use_inode_shortcuts(ctx, 0);
return 0;
errout:
+ e2fsck_use_inode_shortcuts(ctx, 0);
if (dev_fs)
ext2fs_free_mem(&dev_fs);
if (j_inode)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists