[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070625215625.GL5181@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 15:56:25 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
suparna@...ibm.com, cmm@...ibm.com, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7][TAKE5] ext4: support new modes
On Jun 25, 2007 19:20 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> @@ -2499,7 +2500,8 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct inode *inode,
> * currently supporting (pre)allocate mode for extent-based
> * files _only_
> */
> - if (mode != FA_ALLOCATE || !(EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL))
> + if (!(EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) ||
> + !(mode == FA_ALLOCATE || mode == FA_RESV_SPACE))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
This should probably just check for the individual flags it can support
(e.g. no FA_FL_DEALLOC, no FA_FL_DEL_DATA).
I also thought another proposed flag was to determine whether mtime (and
maybe ctime) is changed when doing prealloc/dealloc space? Default should
probably be to change mtime/ctime, and have FA_FL_NO_MTIME. Someone else
should decide if we want to allow changing the file w/o changing ctime, if
that is required even though the file is not visibly changing. Maybe the
ctime update should be implicit if the size or mtime are changing?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists