linux-ext4 - Re: Performance testing results

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1692756695.20070628104652@mail.ru>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:46:52 +0600
From:	sftf <sftf-misc@...l.ru>
To:	valerie.clement@...l.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Performance testing results

Hi!
  IMHO this test is not 100% correct.
  ext3 | data=writeback
  ext4 | data=writeback,extents,delalloc
  xfs  | defaults is ordered !

 So you have compared ext's in writeback (which fastest mode) vs xfs in ordered.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html