[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070703214131.GH6578@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 15:41:31 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: cmm@...ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 4/5] i_version:ext4 inode version update
On Jul 03, 2007 12:19 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Mingming Cao wrote:
> >Index: linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/super.c
> >===================================================================
> >--- linux-2.6.22-rc4.orig/fs/ext4/super.c 2007-06-13
> >17:19:11.000000000 -0700
> >+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4/fs/ext4/super.c 2007-06-13 17:24:45.000000000 -0700
> >@@ -2846,8 +2846,8 @@ out:
> > i_size_write(inode, off+len-towrite);
> > EXT4_I(inode)->i_disksize = inode->i_size;
> > }
> >- inode->i_version++;
> > inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
> >+ inode->i_version = 1;
> > ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
> > mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> > return len - towrite;
>
>
> Is this correct ? . Why do we set the qutoa file inodes version to 1
> during write ?
Hmm, I thought we had previously fixed this?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists