[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1184088605.17636.1.camel@colyt43.site>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:30:05 +0800
From: coly li <colyli@...il.com>
To: "Jose R. Santos" <jrs@...ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: block groups with no inode tables
Hi, once we decide to do this, how about storing inode inside the
directory ?
IMHO, the latter one is more attractive :-)
Coly
在 2007-07-10二的 12:12 -0500,Jose R. Santos写道:
> Hi folks,
>
> As I play with the allocation of the metadata for the FLEX_BG feature,
> it seems that we could benefit from having block groups with no inode
> tables. Right now we allocate one inode table per bg base on the
> inode_blocks_per_group. For FLEX_BG though, it would make more sense
> to have a larger inode tables that fully use the inode bitmap allocated
> on the first few block groups. Once we reach the number of inode per
> FLEX_BG, then the remaining block groups could then have no inode
> tables defined.
>
> The idea here is that we better utilize the inode bitmaps and reduce the
> number of inode tables to improve mkfs/fsck times. We could also
> support expansion of inode since we have block groups that have empty
> entries in the block group descriptors and as long as we can find
> enough empty blocks for the inode table expanding the number of inodes
> should be relatively easy.
>
> Don't know if ext4 currently supports this. Any thoughts?
>
> -JRS
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists