linux-ext4 - Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1184015790.3864.26.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jul 2007 17:16:30 -0400
From:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
To:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
Cc:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org,
	Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...sterfs.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 1/5] i_version:64 bit inode version

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:53 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jul 06, 2007  09:51 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > The use of a mount option means the change attribute could be
> > inconsistent across mounts.  If we really need this, wouldn't it make
> > more sense for it to be a persistent feature of the filesystem, set at
> > mkfs time?
> 
> Yes, having it stored into the superblock in s_flags is probably a good
> idea.  Kalpak, do you think you could get a patch that adds e.g.
> EXT4_FLAGS_NO_INODE_VERSION (like EXT4_FLAGS_SIGNED_HASH in e2fsprogs).
> 
Per our ext4 interlock discussion today, I have dropped the
ext4-no-inode version-mount-option patch from ext4 patch queue. 

Thanks,
Mingming

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html