[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070710202645.GC6417@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 14:26:45 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4-patch-queue rebased to 2.6.22
On Jul 10, 2007 23:25 +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > It might even make sense to change the other #define to be called
> > EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN so people have to think about this when using the #define.
>
> Done. Changes are in ext4 patch queue.
> Can you please have a quick look and see if this is what you preferred ?
Yes, it looks good, though I wonder if it also makes sense to change the
ext4_ext_*_uninitialized() code to use EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN instead of 0x8000,
since that makes it a bit clearer that the two are related.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists