linux-ext4 - Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 4/5] i_version:ext4 inode version update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1184154877.6462.6.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:54:37 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 4/5] i_version:ext4 inode version update

On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 09:47 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 03:37:45AM -0400, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > This patch is on top of i_version_update_vfs.
> > The i_version field of the inode is set on inode creation and incremented when
> > the inode is being modified.
> 
> Which is not what i_version is supposed to do.  It'll get you tons of misses
> for NFSv3 filehandles that rely on the generation staying the same for the
> same file.  Please add a new field for the NFSv4 sequence counter instead
> of making i_version unuseable.

Aren't you confusing i_version and i_generation here? Those are two
separate inode fields.

Cheers
  Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html