linux-ext4 - Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 5/5] i_version: noversion mount option to disable inode version updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:48:38 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	cmm@...ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 5/5] i_version: noversion mount option to disable inode version updates

On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 04:31:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:37:53 -0400
> Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add a "noversion" mount option to disable inode version updates.
> 
> Why is this option being offered to our users?  To reduce disk traffic,
> like noatime?
> 
> If so, what are the implications of this?  What would the user lose?

This has been removed in the latest patch set; it's needed only for
Lustre, because they set the version field themselves.  Lustre needs
the inode version to be globally monotonically increasing, so it can
order updates between two different files, so it does this itself.
NFSv4 only uses i_version to detect changes, and so there's no need to
use a global atomic counter for i_version.  So the thinking was that
there was no point doing the global atomic counter if it was not necessary.

Since "noversion" is Lustre specific, we've dropped that from the list
of patches that we'll push, and so the inode version will only have
local per-inode significance, and not have any global ordering
properties.  

We have not actually benchmarked whether or not doing the global
ordering actually *matters* in terms of being actually noticeable.  If
it isn't noticeable, I wouldn't mind changing things so that we always
make i_version globally significant (without a mount option), and make
life a bit easier for the Lustre folks.  Or if someone other
distributed filesystem requests a globally significant i_version.  But
we can cross that bridge when we get to it....

						- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html