[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070725194908.GS5992@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:49:08 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] e2fsprogs: Support for large inode migration.
On Jul 25, 2007 11:06 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This helps in reverting the changes if end results
> are not correct.The environment variable TUNE2FS_SCRATCH_DIR
> is used to indicate the directory within which the tdb
> file need to be created. The file will be named tune2fs-XXXXXX
> @@ -702,6 +705,23 @@ static void parse_tune2fs_options(int argc, char **argv)
> break;
> + case 'I':
> + new_inode_size = strtoul (optarg, &tmp, 0);
> + if (!((new_inode_size & (new_inode_size - 1)) == 0)) {
> + com_err (program_name, 0,
> + _("bad Inode size - %s"),
> + optarg);
> + usage();
> + }
Please print a more useful message like "inode size must be a power of two",
as "bad inode size - 200" isn't very useful to the user to figure out what
a good inode size is.
> +static void *ext2fs_read_next_inode(ext2_filsys fs,
> + void *inode, void *inode_table,
> + int *retval)
> +{
> + blk = fs->group_desc[group].bg_inode_table;
> + *retval = io_channel_read_blk(fs->io, blk,
> + fs->inode_blocks_per_group, inode_table);
This isn't doing swabbing of the inodes?
> +}
> +
> +static int ext2fs_write_itb(ext2_filsys fs, int group,
> + void *inode_table_block, int free_inodes_count)
> +{
> + int retval;
> + int blk = fs->group_desc[group].bg_inode_table;
> + retval = io_channel_write_blk(fs->io, blk,
> + fs->inode_blocks_per_group, inode_table_block);
This isn't doing swabbing either?
> +static int resize_inode(ext2_filsys fs, unsigned long int new_inode_size)
> +{
> + ext2_ino_t inode_num;
> + int itable_size, retval;
> + int new_inode_per_group, new_max_inode;
> + int copied_inode_count = 0;
> + void *inode, *buf, *tmp_buf, *inode_table;
> + int free_inodes_count = 0, group_count = 0;
> + int old_size = EXT2_INODE_SIZE(fs->super);
> + int max_group = fs->super->s_inodes_count/fs->super->s_inodes_per_group;
> +
> + if (new_inode_size <= fs->super->s_inode_size ) {
> + fprintf(stderr, _("New Inode size too small\n"));
> + return EXT2_ET_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
> + }
Shouldn't this be verified when the inode size is parsed instead of down here?
> + if (I_flag) {
> + if (mount_flags & EXT2_MF_MOUNTED) {
> + fputs(_("The Inode size may only be "
> + "changed when the filesystem is "
> + "unmounted.\n"), stderr);
Why do you capitalize "Inode" in all of the messages?
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists