linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH] e2fsck/e2fsprogs: use sscanf() instead of atoi() in the option parser

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070804021912.GG7449@thunk.org>
Date:	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 22:19:12 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Bernd Schubert <bschubert@...eap.de>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck/e2fsprogs: use sscanf() instead of atoi() in the option parser

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:50:04PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> [resent since the first mail doesn't seem to make it to this list]
> 
> using atoi() should be avoided in the option parser since it doesn't check
> for errors. I almost destroyed an important filesystem since I
> specified "e2fsck -C -n" and -n was parsed as option to -C

Hi Bernd,

Can you please include a DCO.  i.e.,

Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@...eap.de>

In your patch submissions.  See the SUBMITTING-PATCHES file in the
top-level directory of e2fsprogs source tree for the significance of
the Signed-off-by line.  For this patch, can you indicate whether you
are willing to add a Signed-off-by: DCO?

Thanks, regards,

						- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html