[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46BC8D61.9080400@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:08:01 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dir_index: error out instead of BUG on corrupt hash dir
limit
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Aug 09, 2007 17:41 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> A corrupt ondisk hash dir limit will trip an assert in dx_probe,
>>> which calls BUG(). Instead, we can just issue the warning and
>>> fail dx_probe like the other 3 tests just before it. Thanks
>>> to aviro for suggesting this...
>> BTW this type of corruption is apparently quite easily generated by
>> using the binary windows-only ext driver at www.fs-driver.org....
>
> I'd like to see the actual corruption, to find out why the hash-type
> check didn't find it. If it is because LDISKFS_DX_HASH_LEGACY hash
> type is zero, I think we can disable that hash type, and people will
> just have to run "e2fsck -fD" to reindex to a new type. This hasn't
> been on for a long, long time.
So far I haven't been able to find it in any of the images provided.
We may have to dual-boot windows & run the crummy driver for a while to
track it down, if we care enough.
Which reminds me, what do you think of the wording in the ext3_warning I
added - is "corruption" appropriate? The other warnings aren't quite so
stark... hmm maybe we should add "have you been running a binary-only
driver for windows?" :)
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists