[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070810184506.GU6689@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:45:06 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: Coly Li <coyli@...e.de>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: remove fragment support (V3)
On Aug 11, 2007 01:13 +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> - --- a/debugfs/set_fields.c
> +++ b/debugfs/set_fields.c
> @@ -65,9 +65,7 @@ static struct field_set_info super_fields[] = {
> { "free_inodes_count", &set_sb.s_free_inodes_count, 4, parse_uint },
> { "first_data_block", &set_sb.s_first_data_block, 4, parse_uint },
> { "log_block_size", &set_sb.s_log_block_size, 4, parse_uint },
> - - { "log_frag_size", &set_sb.s_log_frag_size, 4, parse_int },
> { "blocks_per_group", &set_sb.s_blocks_per_group, 4, parse_uint },
> - - { "frags_per_group", &set_sb.s_frags_per_group, 4, parse_uint },
> { "inodes_per_group", &set_sb.s_inodes_per_group, 4, parse_uint },
> { "mtime", &set_sb.s_mtime, 4, parse_time },
> { "wtime", &set_sb.s_wtime, 4, parse_time },
> @@ -141,10 +139,7 @@ static struct field_set_info inode_fields[] = {
> { "generation", &set_inode.i_generation, 4, parse_uint },
> { "file_acl", &set_inode.i_file_acl, 4, parse_uint },
> { "dir_acl", &set_inode.i_dir_acl, 4, parse_uint },
> - - { "faddr", &set_inode.i_faddr, 4, parse_uint },
> { "blocks_hi", &set_inode.osd2.linux2.l_i_blocks_hi, 2, parse_uint },
> - - { "frag", &set_inode.osd2.hurd2.h_i_frag, 1, parse_uint },
> - - { "fsize", &set_inode.osd2.hurd2.h_i_fsize, 1, parse_uint },
> { "uid_high", &set_inode.osd2.linux2.l_i_uid_high, 2, parse_uint },
> { "gid_high", &set_inode.osd2.linux2.l_i_gid_high, 2, parse_uint },
> { "author", &set_inode.osd2.hurd2.h_i_author, 4, parse_uint },
There should still be some way to set these (now unused) fields, so that
it is possible to generate failure cases.
> @@ -293,9 +293,6 @@ static _INLINE_ void expand_inode_expression(char ch,
> time_str = asctime(do_gmt ? gmtime(&t) : localtime(&t));
> printf("%.24s", time_str);
> break;
> - - case 'F':
> - - printf("%u", inode->i_faddr);
> - - break;
Did you check if @IF is used anywhere else in the problem messages?
> @@ -497,11 +497,6 @@ void check_super_block(e2fsck_t ctx)
> check_super_value(ctx, "log_block_size", sb->s_log_block_size,
> MIN_CHECK | MAX_CHECK, 0,
> EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE - EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE);
> - - check_super_value(ctx, "log_frag_size", sb->s_log_frag_size,
> - - MIN_CHECK | MAX_CHECK, 0, sb->s_log_block_size);
> - - check_super_value(ctx, "frags_per_group", sb->s_frags_per_group,
> - - MIN_CHECK | MAX_CHECK, sb->s_blocks_per_group,
> - - bpg_max);
We may want to keep these checks, as a way to detect corruption. We
will never re-use the superblock fields for anything.
Did you run "make check"? I'd think some of the test cases depend on
the superblock output.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists