linux-ext4 - Re: [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709020438490.28046@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Sun, 2 Sep 2007 04:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	adilger@...sterfs.com, sho@...s.nec.co.jp,
	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k)

On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 05:12:18PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > >From clameter:
> > Teach jbd/jbd2 slab management to support >8k block size. Without this, it refused to mount on >8k ext3.
> 
> 
> But the real fix is to kill this code.  We can't send down slab pages
> down the block layer without breaking iscsi or aoe.  And this code is
> only used in so rare cases that all the normal testing won't hit it.
> Very bad combination.

We are doing what you describe right now. So the current code is broken?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html