[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46E55632.6040804@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:35:30 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Alex Tomas <alex@...sterfs.com>
CC: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mballoc patches
Alex Tomas wrote:
> Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * default stripe size = 1MB
>> + */
>> +#define MB_DEFAULT_STRIPE 256
>
> agree, though seems we'd better make it blocksize-insensitive
Well, for now this isn't even used at *all* so might as well just remove it.
>> +static int mb_find_extent(struct ext4_buddy *e3b, int order, int block,
>> + int needed, struct ext4_free_extent *ex)
>>
>> how many "what" are needed?
>
> well, blocks :)
I figured, though bytes is a possibility. :) In general, being
explicit about units helps; xfs suffers a bit from byte/block/sector
confusion in the code, in some places.
>> Also there are a *lot* of BUGs and BUG_ONs added in this patch... are
>> none of these recoverable?
>
> well, I'll review the code in this regard again, but most of them are not.
> not that I like kernel panics, but BUG_ON() are very helpful to maintain
> code, especially in long-term.
Ok, I just think there might be upstream pushback on these, at one point
at least they were trying to reduce the nr. of BUG calls in the code...
Thanks,
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists