[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070914225438.GK5377@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:54:38 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: Ext4 patch queue updated(2.6.23-rc6)
On Sep 14, 2007 12:03 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> Ted, could you please update the ext4 git tree with the patches before
> the "unstable" mark, so we could get more air time in mm tree for
> testing?
>
> Thanks,
> Mingming
>
> current patch series
>
> # Rebased the patches to 2.6.23-rc6
> jbd_slab_cleanup.patch
> sparse-fix.patch
>
> # Add journal checksums
> ext4-journal_chksum-2.6.20.patch
> ext4-journal-chksum-review-fix.patch
Actually, the journal checksum patches should probably be moved into
the "unstable" part of the series, given the number of problems reported
on them (also in more heavy testing at CFS). These are also not in use
in production anywhere, unlike e.g. uninit_groups which have 6 months *
50 servers of testing or more.
> #########
> #FLEX_BG
> ########
> flex_bg_kernel.patch
This should probably go into the "stable" part of the patches - it
is a conceptually simple patch, and the sooner INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG gets
upstream the better.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists