[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F10FA4.6060902@bull.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:01:40 +0200
From: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avantika Mathur <mathur@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>,
cmm@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ext4: Uninitialized Block Groups
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> the variable free is confusingly named here. It is not the free inode
> count.
> rather it indicate the last used relative inode number in the group. How
> about
> the below ?
>
> -aneesh
I agree, it's better.
Valérie
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> index 4250c02..cfe2e09 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
> @@ -633,17 +633,21 @@ got:
> /* If we didn't allocate from within the initialized part of the inode
> * table then we need to initialize up to this inode. */
> if (EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM)) {
> - if (gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT)) {
> + if (gdp->bg_flags & cpu_to_le16(EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT))
> gdp->bg_flags &= cpu_to_le16(~EXT4_BG_INODE_UNINIT);
> - free = EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb);
> - } else {
> - free = EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb) -
> - le16_to_cpu(gdp->bg_itable_unused);
> - }
>
> - if (ino > free)
> + /*
> + * Check the relative inode number against the last used
> + * relative inode number in this group. if it is greater
> + * we need to update the bg_itable_unused count
> + *
> + */
> + if (ino > (EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb) -
> + le16_to_cpu(gdp->bg_itable_unused))) {
> +
> gdp->bg_itable_unused =
> cpu_to_le16(EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb) - ino);
> + }
> }
>
> gdp->bg_free_inodes_count =
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists