[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070925213528.GA11088@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:35:28 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
List util-linux-ng <util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] obsolete libcom-err for SuSE e2fsprogs
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:25:50PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > Technical details :-)
>
> What do you miss, these are all technical details. :) In simple words,
> we need a completely policy-free, not try-to-be-smart in any sense set
> of functions to identify a bytestream by magic bytes.
Which is exactly what mount and fsck should be doing aswell for a given
device. In addition they also have the need to find a device if the
fstab line is identified with LABEL and UUID. But these are rather
separate issues.
> Hmm, only if you reaqlly don't want to pull it in util-linux, we could
> have it as a separate tree. I still think util-linux is the best place,
> because the most important user of it is mount/fsck. It's your call, I
> would have no problem sending patches against util-linux. :)
Shipping this with util-linux would make some sense. Then again I'm
a big fan of not mixing up shared libraries and binaries in the same
package. This just means the distros have to split them into separate
packages again.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists