linux-ext4 - Re: Ext4 devel interlock meeting minutes (October 1, 2007)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071002055831.GH5702@schatzie.adilger.int>
Date:	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 23:58:31 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
To:	Avantika Mathur <mathur@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 devel interlock meeting minutes (October 1, 2007)

On Oct 01, 2007  15:10 -0700, Avantika Mathur wrote:
> Delayed Allocation:
> - There has been an lkml thread about these patches.
> - We have and approach that works for ext4, implemented at the vfs 
> level, but unless we can prove it can work for other filesystems, it 
> will not be accepted.  
> - Christoph Hellwig has commented that these patches will not work for 
> XFS.  

Hmm, but I thought that Christoph also agreed that it would be OK to
get the ext4 delalloc code merged separately, so long as it doesn't
need big/any changes to the VFS to implement it.  It might be that the
ext4 and XFS code is different enough that they cannot share the
delayed allocation code.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html