[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4702546A.1050802@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:23:38 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
CC: Avantika Mathur <mathur@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 devel interlock meeting minutes (October 1, 2007)
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Oct 01, 2007 15:10 -0700, Avantika Mathur wrote:
>> Delayed Allocation:
>> - There has been an lkml thread about these patches.
>> - We have and approach that works for ext4, implemented at the vfs
>> level, but unless we can prove it can work for other filesystems, it
>> will not be accepted.
>> - Christoph Hellwig has commented that these patches will not work for
>> XFS.
>
> Hmm, but I thought that Christoph also agreed that it would be OK to
> get the ext4 delalloc code merged separately, so long as it doesn't
> need big/any changes to the VFS to implement it. It might be that the
> ext4 and XFS code is different enough that they cannot share the
> delayed allocation code.
IIRC there is only one change to the VFS, a test for buffer_delay() in
__block_write_full_page(). XFS is the only current caller of
set_buffer_delay, and XFS does not even use the block_write_full_page path.
The rest was a huge chunk dropped into mpage.c, but not interfering with
anything else.
So, I don't see any conflict.
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists