lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:45:48 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <>
CC:	linux-ext4 <>
Subject: Re: patch queue updated

Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 17:35 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> I have updated the patch queue at 
>> Changes:
>> a) Add large-file-blocktype.patch  large-file.patch patch.
> Could you send them out separately? I noticed that your queue is not
> based on the last ext4 patch queue. You modified mballoc-core.patch
> directly with large file block type changes...but your updated
> mballoc-core.patch doesn't have the latest proc fs fix from Ted. 

It has the changes.
I searched for PROC_FS . I did a git pull on patch queue before updating the patches.

> I would appreciate if you separete the largeblocktype changes for
> mballoc out of the core mballoc changes, as that patch is getting really
> big already.
>> b) Add the stable-boundary-patch with dummy change
>> c) Add stable-boundary-undo.patch which undo the above dummy change.
> The stable-boundary patch is being removed from ext4 patch queue,as some
> tools expect a meaning code diff to apply any patch.

That is why i added a dummy change which is reverted by the later patch.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists