[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <470DC09A.8060006@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:50:10 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
CC: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Sato <sho@...s.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Support large files
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2007 10:41 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> This patch converts ext4_inode i_blocks to represent total
>> blocks occupied by the inode in file system block size.
>> Earlier the variable used to represent this in 512 byte
>> block size. This actually limited the total size of the file.
>>
>> This is enabled only if the incompat feature flag
>> EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LARGE_BLOCK is set in super block
>> and the kernel is built with CONFIG_LSF.
>
> NACK. This must be an old version of the patch. The major problem is
> that there is no way to incrementally enable this feature, so as soon
> as some file needs to be larger than 2TB, it means that the i_blocks
> count on EVERY file needs to be updated, or it will be incorrect.
>
> The updated proposal was to set EXT4_HUGE_FILE_FL on the inodes that
> are using fs-blocksize for i_blocks, and if this flag is not set then
> use 512-byte i_blocks. This allows the filesystem to be compatible
> unless there really are gigantic files.
>
So how do we calculate ext4_max_size ? Can we do
if CONFIG_LSF is set then consider that that i_blocks can be represented
using file system block size ?
-aneesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists