[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <470DE640.3040101@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:30:48 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
CC: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Subject: ext4_inode difference between e2fsprogs and ext4
in e2fsprogs we have
union {
struct {
__u16 l_i_blocks_hi;
__u16 i_pad1;
__u16 l_i_uid_high; /* these 2 fields */
__u16 l_i_gid_high; /* were reserved2[0] */
__u32 l_i_reserved2;
} linux2;
In ext4 we have
union {
struct {
__le16 l_i_reserved1; /* Obsoleted fragment number/size which are removed in ext4 */
__le16 l_i_file_acl_high;
__le16 l_i_uid_high; /* these 2 fields */
__le16 l_i_gid_high; /* were reserved2[0] */
__u32 l_i_reserved2;
} linux2;
Last week we were discussing about taking that l_i_reserved1 and using that for making file_acl 64 bit and using the
lower l_i_reserved2 for 64 bit dir_acl.
Now where will i put l_i_blocks_hi ?
-aneesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists