[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071026221938.GV3042@webber.adilger.int>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:19:38 -0600
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Tomas <alex.tomas@....com>
Subject: Re: delalloc fragmenting files?
On Oct 26, 2007 16:24 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> The resulting file had over 4k extents.
> [root@...r-05 ~]# filefrag -v /mnt/test/foobar | grep -i extents
> File is stored in extents format
> /mnt/test/foobar: 4075 extents found
On a related note - we're just putting the finishing touches on the
FIEMAP patches for ext4 + e2fsprogs, so that we can get decent looking
output from filefrag, and much more efficiently than FIBMAP.
> if I don't mount with delalloc:
>
> mount -t ext4dev -o data=writeback,extents,mballoc /dev/sdb7 /mnt/test
>
> and run the same dd, I get 229 extents:
>
> [root@...r-05 ~]# filefrag -v /mnt/test/foobar | grep -i extents
> File is stored in extents format
> /mnt/test/foobar: 229 extents found
One of the issues is that w/o delalloc the mballoc code only gets
single-block allocations, so there might be a problem with the interface
to mballoc. That might be caused by the fact the patches were changed
at one point from delalloc-atop-mballoc to mballoc-atop-delalloc, and
something was missed in that conversion.
Have you tried O_DIRECT? That is another way to access mballoc w/o
using delalloc.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Software Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists