[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4728ED3B.1060407@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:01:47 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Tomas <alex.tomas@....com>
Subject: Re: delalloc fragmenting files?
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> One of the issues is that w/o delalloc the mballoc code only gets
> single-block allocations, so there might be a problem with the interface
> to mballoc. That might be caused by the fact the patches were changed
> at one point from delalloc-atop-mballoc to mballoc-atop-delalloc, and
> something was missed in that conversion.
I've been testing this with a 16x1MB buffered dd to a fresh filesystem;
it gets 7 extents, and out of order. :(
First block: 37120
Last block: 63427
Discontinuity: Block 1024 is at 38400 (was 38143)
Discontinuity: Block 1036 is at 57344 (was 38411)
Discontinuity: Block 2048 is at 38412 (was 58355)
Discontinuity: Block 2072 is at 61440 (was 38435)
Discontinuity: Block 3072 is at 38436 (was 62439)
Discontinuity: Block 3108 is at 62440 (was 38471)
/mnt/test/testfile: 7 extents found
One thing that seems to be happening is that thanks to delalloc, a nice
big request is coming in (only 1036 blocks of the 4096, not quite sure
why), but then it gets into ext4_mb_normalize_request(), which finds the
most blocks it can "preallocate" is 256, and chops down the request to
256 blocks. Shouldn't this preallocation be over & above what was asked
for, vs. reducing the request?
Ok, so, we get allocations in 256-block chunks... Why they don't all
come out contiguous, I don't know yet...
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists