linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH][RFC]Ext4: Use get_cpu()/put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 3 Nov 2007 13:01:37 +0800
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To:	Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com>
Cc:	ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]Ext4: Use get_cpu()/put_cpu() in preemptible
	context

On Nov 02, 2007  17:35 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc1/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc1.orig/fs/ext4/mballoc.c	2007-11-02 17:22:18.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc1/fs/ext4/mballoc.c	2007-11-02 17:23:02.000000000 -0700
> @@ -4006,7 +4006,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_group_or_file(struct
>  		return;
>  
>  	BUG_ON(ac->ac_lg != NULL);
> -	ac->ac_lg = &sbi->s_locality_groups[smp_processor_id()];
> +	ac->ac_lg = &sbi->s_locality_groups[get_cpu()];
> +	put_cpu();
>  
>  	/* we're going to use group allocation */
>  	ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_HINT_GROUP_ALLOC;

Shouldn't the put_cpu() be after ac->ac_lg is no longer being used?
I guess there would otherwise be a danger of other processes using
the same s_locality_groups[] struct?

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Software Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html