[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071121214327.GC3116@webber.adilger.int>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:43:27 -0700
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: add block bitmap validation
On Nov 19, 2007 20:26 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> +static int ext4_valid_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
> + struct ext4_group_desc *desc,
> + unsigned int block_group,
> + struct buffer_head *bh)
> +{
> + if (EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb, EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG)) {
> + /* with FLEX_BG, the inode/block bitmaps and itable
> + * blocks may not be in the group at all
> + * so the bitmap validation will be skipped for those groups
> + * or it has to also read the block group where the bitmaps
> + * are located to verify they are set.
> + */
> + return 1;
> + }
Rather than skipping the bitmap check entirely when FLEX_BG is enabled,
it is probably better to just validate whether each of the bitmap/itable
offsets are within the bitmap being read, like:
offset = ...
if (offset < EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) &&
ext4_test_bit(offset, bh->b_data))
/* bad block bitmap */
goto err_out;
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Software Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists