[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071209.004517.201813773.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:45:17 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: m.kozlowski@...land.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1: some issues on sparc64
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 10:22:39 -0800
> That's
>
> J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_jbddirty(bh));
>
> at the end of journal_unmap_buffer().
>
> I don't recall seeing that before and I can't think of anything we've
> done recently which could cause it, sorry.
If the per-cpu data patches are in the -mm tree that is the first
place I would start looking at for possible cause.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists