linux-ext4 - [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080102013218.GO27566@does.not.exist>
Date:	Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:32:18 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To:	sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@...sterfs.com
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN

It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels, 
but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel 
offered it - and that's definitely not intended.

Anyone who _really_ wants to test ext4 should anyway be able to do the 
trivial change of removing the "depends on BROKEN" line.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>

---
f778e1d046a3554ca15b8637afd0ffbf4790801c 
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
index 487236c..d850725 100644
--- a/fs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/Kconfig
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ config EXT3_FS_SECURITY
 
 config EXT4DEV_FS
 	tristate "Ext4dev/ext4 extended fs support development (EXPERIMENTAL)"
-	depends on EXPERIMENTAL
+	depends on BROKEN
 	select JBD2
 	select CRC16
 	help

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html