[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080102192629.28e67241.diegocg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 19:26:29 +0100
From: Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@...sterfs.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN
El Wed, 2 Jan 2008 03:32:18 +0200, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> escribió:
> It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels,
> but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel
> offered it - and that's definitely not intended.
But isn't that the whole purpose of having ext4 snapshots in the stable kernel - to
allow people to try it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists