| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080102204034.703ebdd3@the-village.bc.nu> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:40:34 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com> Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@...sterfs.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.24 patch] let EXT4DEV_FS depend on BROKEN On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 10:41:57 -0700 Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com> wrote: > On Jan 02, 2008 03:32 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > It might make sense to offer ext4 in -mm and even in early -rc kernels, > > but I've already seen people using ext4 simply because a stable kernel > > offered it - and that's definitely not intended. > > > > Anyone who _really_ wants to test ext4 should anyway be able to do the > > trivial change of removing the "depends on BROKEN" line. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> > > > > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ config EXT3_FS_SECURITY > > > > config EXT4DEV_FS > > tristate "Ext4dev/ext4 extended fs support development (EXPERIMENTAL)" > > - depends on EXPERIMENTAL > > + depends on BROKEN > > select JBD2 > > select CRC16 > > help > > Isn't CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL enough? Of course it is - Adrian is however trying to remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL and reality is getting in his way again - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists