[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <477D4EA4.6040402@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 15:07:48 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Alex Tomas <Alex.Tomas@....COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UPDATED2: types fixup for mballoc
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jan 03, 2008 14:10 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> @@ -1732,17 +1735,19 @@ static void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct
>> + /* find first stripe-aligned block in group */
>> + a = e4b->bd_group * EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)
>> + le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block);
>> + a += sbi->s_stripe - 1;
>
> Why not just have "+ sbi->s_stipe - 1" on the previous line, instead of "+="?
hmm good point.
> Also minor coding style nit: the "+" is normally at the end of the previous
> line instead of at the start of the next line, so:
>
> /* find first stripe-aligned block in group */
> a = e4b->bd_group * EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) +
> le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) + sbi->s_stripe - 1;
Ok, that was inherited :)
>> + a = (a * sbi->s_stripe) - le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block);
>> + i = do_div(a, EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb));
>
> I guess this doesn't stricly need to be a modulus either, because we know
> which group this will be in and can just subtract the start. You can just do:
>
> /* find first stripe-aligned block in this group */
> group_start = e4b->bd_group * EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) +;
> le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block);
>
> a = group_start + sbi->s_stripe - 1;
> do_div(a, sbi->s_stripe);
> a = (a * sbi->s_stripe) - group_start;
Ok, I knew I had stared at this for too long :)
4th try coming soon.
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists