lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:39:51 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <>
To:	Paolo Ciarrocchi <>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <>,
	Mathieu Segaud <>,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Coding Style]: misc fixes for fs/ext{3,4}/acl.{c,h}

On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:12:44AM +0100, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> Isn't it a timing problem?
> I mean, I guess that codying style fixes are OK if there is a good coordination
> with the maintainer and patches are sent with the right timing in
> order to not cause
> problems in the process.

But because running some kind of mechanical script and fixing up the
problems is relatively mindless, it doesn't *add* anything.  Only the
maintainer knows when it is a reasonably convenient time to fix all of
the problems, or when to fix portions of the code that is being
reworked anyway --- and the maintainer can just run the script by
himself, for himself.  The patch doesn't actually save him much work,
and in some cases, is actually more work than simply regenerating the
fixes *after* the other patches waiting in his patch queue have been
applied (but of course, it screws up everyone else's patches that
haven't been submitted to the maintainer yet).

In some cases, it's worth it.  In other (most) cases, it really isn't.

   	       	    	       	  	       - Ted
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists