lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080109182428.GC11852@skywalker> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:54:28 +0530 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger@....com, bzzz@....com, cmm@...ibm.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix the soft lockup with multi block allocator. On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:10:41PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > With the multi block allocator when we don't have prealloc space we discard > > @@ -3790,7 +3782,9 @@ repeat: > > > > /* if we still need more blocks and some PAs were used, try again */ > > if (free < needed && busy) { > > + busy = 0; > > ext4_unlock_group(sb, group); > > + schedule_timeout(HZ); > > goto repeat; > > } > Hmm, wouldn't just schedule() be enough here? That would give a good > chance to other processes to proceed and we would avoid this artificial > wait of 1s which is quite ugly IMO. > > Honza But then who will wake up the task ?. I have the below comment added to the patch in the patch queue. /* * We see this quiet rare. But if a particular workload is * effected by this we may need to add a waitqueue */ -aneesh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists