[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4788ED9E.3090207@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:41:02 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Bug 9732] New: oops in extent code via ext4_fallocate]
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:42:00PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> The BUG_ON is:
>>
>> BUG_ON(*logical < le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block) + le16_to_cpu(ex->ee_len));
>>
>> where these were the values:
>>
>> logical 8 ee_block 0 ee_len 32776
>>
>> Haven't looked further into it yet.
>>
>
> Not able to reproduce. Why is it calling ext4_ext_search_left for that
> value of logical ? ext4_ext_get_blocks should have found that the
> logical belong to an already existing extent and return from there. It
> should have returned from
>
> 2365 if (create == EXT4_CREATE_UNINITIALIZED_EXT)
> 2366 goto out;
>
>
> root@...u-image:/ext4# /root/testfallocate -f a 0 100
> root@...u-image:/ext4# /root/truncate ./a 50
> root@...u-image:/ext4# /root/testfallocate -f a 0 100
This isn't exercising extents code at all, all your sizes are all within
the first block. Try the numbers I have in the bug?
Or more simply,
[root@...r-05 sdb8]# ./testfallocate -f testfile 0 32768
[root@...r-05 sdb8]# ./testfallocate -f testfile 16384 65536
or
[root@...r-05 sdb8]# ./testfallocate -f testfile 0 16384
[root@...r-05 sdb8]# ./testfallocate -f testfile 32768 65536
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists