[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080115155914.c72aaea9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:59:14 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@...il.com>
Cc: sct@...hat.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jonas.bonn@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not try lock_acquire after handle made invalid
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:39:26 +0100
Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@...il.com> wrote:
> This likely fixes the oops in __lock_acquire reported as:
>
> http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=2753&msgid=
> http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=2749&msgid=
>
> In these reported oopses, start_this_handle is returning -EROFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/jbd/transaction.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd/transaction.c b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> index 08ff6c7..038ed74 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
> @@ -288,10 +288,12 @@ handle_t *journal_start(journal_t *journal, int nblocks)
> jbd_free_handle(handle);
> current->journal_info = NULL;
> handle = ERR_PTR(err);
> + goto out;
> }
>
> lock_acquire(&handle->h_lockdep_map, 0, 0, 0, 2, _THIS_IP_);
>
> +out:
> return handle;
> }
Yeah, thanks.
It looks like we forgot to port this lockdep support into ext4. This is
bad. What else got lost?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists