[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87abn4eiyl.fsf@barad-dur.regala.cx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:26:42 +0100
From: Mathieu SEGAUD <mathieu.segaud@...ala.cx>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sct@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert EXT2 to use unlocked_ioctl
Vous m'avez dit récemment :
> On Thursday 17 January 2008, Mathieu SEGAUD wrote:
>> yep, they do. I noticed this nested calls. I guess I will add
>> _extX_compat_ioctl() running with no BKL's which would be used by both
>> extX_ioctl() and extX_compat_ioctl().
>> Any comments on such a strategy ? thanks a lot for the reminder :)
>>
>
> Why not just kill the lock_kernel() in extX_compat_ioctl() ?
sure, I just posted I wasn't that awake enough to see this one :)
by the way thanks for the heads up.
I repost the whole thing corrected.
--
Mathieu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists