lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20080204181941.03f60eb0@172.19.0.2>
Date:	Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:15:25 +0900
From:	Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@....ntt.co.jp>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND] [PATCH] ext3,4:fdatasync should skip metadata
  writeout when overwriting

Hi.

Currently fdatasync is identical to fsync in ext3,4.
I think fdatasync should skip journal flush in data=ordered and data=writeback mode
when it overwrites to already-instantiated blocks on HDD.
When I_DIRTY_DATASYNC flag is not set, fdatasync should skip journal writeout
because this indicates only atime or/and mtime updates.  

Following patch is the same approach of ext2's fsync code(ext2_sync_file).

I did a performance test using the sysbench.

#sysbench --num-threads=128 --max-requests=50000 --test=fileio --file-total-size=128G 
--file-test-mode=rndwr --file-fsync-mode=fdatasync run

The result was:

	-2.6.24
	Operations performed:  0 Read, 50080 Write, 59600 Other = 109680 Total
	Read 0b  Written 782.5Mb  Total transferred 782.5Mb  (12.116Mb/sec)
	  775.45 Requests/sec executed

	Test execution summary:
	    total time:                          64.5814s
	    total number of events:              50080
	    total time taken by event execution: 3713.9836
	    per-request statistics:
	         min:                            0.0000s
	         avg:                            0.0742s
	         max:                            0.9375s
	         approx.  95 percentile:         0.2901s

	Threads fairness:
	    events (avg/stddev):           391.2500/23.26
	    execution time (avg/stddev):   29.0155/1.99


	-2.6.24-patched
	Operations performed:  0 Read, 50009 Write, 61596 Other = 111605 Total
	Read 0b  Written 781.39Mb  Total transferred 781.39Mb  (16.419Mb/sec)
	 1050.83 Requests/sec executed

	Test execution summary:
	    total time:                          47.5900s
	    total number of events:              50009
	    total time taken by event execution: 2934.5768
	    per-request statistics:
 	         min:                            0.0000s
	         avg:                            0.0587s
 	         max:                            0.8938s
	         approx.  95 percentile:         0.1993s

	Threads fairness:
	    events (avg/stddev):           390.6953/22.64
	    execution time (avg/stddev):   22.9264/1.17


Filesystem I/O throughput was improved.

Thanks.

Signed-off-by :Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@....ntt.co.jp>

diff -Nrup linux-2.6.24.org/fs/ext3/fsync.c linux-2.6.24/fs/ext3/fsync.c
--- linux-2.6.24.org/fs/ext3/fsync.c	2008-01-25 07:58:37.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.24/fs/ext3/fsync.c	2008-02-04 12:42:42.000000000 +0900
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ int ext3_sync_file(struct file * file, s
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (datasync && !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC))
+		goto out;
+
 	/*
 	 * The VFS has written the file data.  If the inode is unaltered
 	 * then we need not start a commit.
diff -Nrup linux-2.6.24.org/fs/ext4/fsync.c linux-2.6.24/fs/ext4/fsync.c
--- linux-2.6.24.org/fs/ext4/fsync.c	2008-01-25 07:58:37.000000000 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.24/fs/ext4/fsync.c	2008-02-04 12:43:37.000000000 +0900
@@ -72,6 +72,9 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file * file, s
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+        if (datasync && !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC))
+                goto out;
+
 	/*
 	 * The VFS has written the file data.  If the inode is unaltered
 	 * then we need not start a commit.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ