lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080204121131.a6e07705.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:11:31 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: - disable-ext4.patch removed from -mm tree

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:00:44 -0500 Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 07:15:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:36:26 -0500 Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:25:51PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > When I merge David's iget coversion patches this will instead wreck the
> > > > ext4 patchset.
> > > 
> > > That's ok, it shouldn't be hard for me to fix this up.  How quickly
> > > will you be able to merge David's iget converstion patches?
> > 
> > They're about 1,000 patches back.
> 
> OK, if you're not planning on pushing David's changes to Linus right
> away, what if I pull in David's
> 
> 	iget-stop-ext4-from-using-iget-and-read_inode-try.patch 
> 
> and push it plus some other ext4 bug fixes directly to Linus, and let
> you know when that has happened so you can drop David's patch from
> your queue?

Sure, go for it.

> David's changes to ext4 can be applied standalone without the rest of
> his series, so it would be safe to push that to Linus independently
> and in advance of the rest of his series.  That should also help
> reduce the number of inter-patch queue dependencies.

That patch series is kind of logjammed anyway because it breaks isofs. 
Last time I discussed this with David he seemed to find this amusing rather
than an urgent problem.  I'd drop the whole lot if there weren't lots of
other patches dependent upon them.  Mayeb I can do a selective droppage,
but I hate going out-of-order, and merging untested patch combinations.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ