[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1202200946.4280.4.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:12:26 +1030
From: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...b.org.au>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 9855] ext3 ACL corruption
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:06 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Hmm, I wonder if e2fsck is calculating the wrong file offset or something?
> The kernel appears to be taking the EA data offset from the end of
> i_extra_isize and the ext3_xattr_ibody_header fields (so 0x88 + e_value_offs
> from the start of the inode).
>
> Conversely, debugfs isn't having any problem with this EA at all.
>
> h, I think I see the problem, and this was fixed in newer e2fsck.
> The EAs are stored "out of order" in the inode and older e2fsprogs
> considered that an error. That was fixed in the final 1.40 release:
>
> Remove check in e2fsck which requires EA's in inodes to be sorted;
> they don't need to be sorted, and e2fsck was previously wrongly
> clearing unsorted EA's stored in the inode structure.
Ah, I think you got it! I've just now reproduced the problem on one
filesystem with the old e2fsck-1.40-WIP from Debian Etch and then
checked again with the newer e2fsck-1.40.5 from Sid. The new version
doesn't report any problems.
Thanks very much for your time looking into this.
Regards,
Kevin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists