linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Move fsck from e2fsprogs to util-linux-ng

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ae72650802061637t2185aaddt8a921c2fb3e8c097@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:37:43 +0100
From:	"Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	"Karel Zak" <kzak@...hat.com>, "Matthias Koenig" <mkoenig@...e.de>,
	util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Move fsck from e2fsprogs to util-linux-ng

On Feb 6, 2008 3:05 PM, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:56:51PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > It would be nice to add a note
> >
> >     "fsck is deprecated in favor of fsck from util-linux-ng"
> >
> > to RELEASE-NOTES in e2fsprogs.
>
> I don't want to deprecate fsck quite yet from e2fsprogs, because there
> are some ext4 issues with fsck (or more accurately, fsck's use of
> vol_id instead of blkid), where it is more convenient if at least for
> distros that are being aggressive with ext4 testing, if we don't try
> to move fsck just now.

Care to explain what ext4 development has to do with the generic fsck program?
I don''t see any convincing reason not to move that now.

Kay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html