[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1202490041.6852.11.camel@norville.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:00:41 -0600
From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: cmm@...ibm.com
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] allocate struct ext4_allocation_context from
a kmem cache to save stack space
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 08:39 -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 09:45 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:35 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > it'll build:
> > >
> > > static inline struct proc_dir_entry *proc_mkdir(const char *name,
> > > struct proc_dir_entry *parent) {return NULL;}
> > >
> > > yes, it'll issue a printk though. *shrug*
> > >
> printk could be removed...so as long as it builds fine. I had looked at
> the history yesterday and find this fix
> http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2007/10/10/2
> so I was under impression that the ifdefs was added to fix compile
> issue. I did not look more closely. Maybe that's not a issue any more.
It looks like the problem is that proc_root_fs is not defined when
CONFIG_PROC_FS is undefined. Even though proc_mkdir() is defined as an
inline function, the compile still fails.
proc_root_ext4 = proc_mkdir(EXT4_ROOT, proc_root_fs);
Maybe the best thing would be to put some dummy define in proc_fs.h
like:
#define proc_root_fs NULL
> > > I like fewer #ifdefs better than more, but doesn't matter much to me.
> >
>
> Oh, I prefer fewer #ifdefs too.:-)
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists