[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47B43895.7040709@bull.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:48:21 +0100
From: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@...l.net>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:910!
Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>>> index b0f84b4..0275150 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>>> @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_mark_free_simple(struct super_block *sb,
>>> unsigned short chunk;
>>> unsigned short border;
>>>
>>> - BUG_ON(len >= EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb));
>>> + BUG_ON(len > EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb));
>>>
>>> border = 2 << sb->s_blocksize_bits;
>>>
>>> @@ -3286,7 +3286,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
>>> }
>>> BUG_ON(start + size <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical &&
>>> start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical);
>>> - BUG_ON(size <= 0 || size >= EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(ac->ac_sb));
>>> + BUG_ON(size <= 0 || size > EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(ac->ac_sb));
>
> I am not sure about this. Here size is the normalized request len.
> Did we hit this BUG_ON ?
In fact, no. So, I'll not make the change now.
Thanks for your response and your explanations.
Valerie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists